|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Atticus Fynch
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.17 17:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
Im a science and technology geek and a die hard NASA fan.
NASA was very cool, very cutting edge IMO and I scoffed at people that said we never landed onthe moon. Being a fair person though I listened to their arguments.
Well, it is a damn good argument. In fact, so good that I no longer believe we landed on the moon. I also came to the conclusion that NASA is full of ****.
Big 180 for me.
Here are two links with very convincing arguments. Makes for interesting reading.
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/esp_luna_30.htm
Your thoughts?
PS. I also think the Mythbusters sold out on their Moon conspiracy episode as they had NASA helping them out with their experiments.
Of course, had they found the myth plausible, it probably never would have made it on the air....so it was joke from the start.
|
Atticus Fynch
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.17 19:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Caleidascope wrote:Can we agree that Soviets landed remote controlled vehicles, Lunakhods, on the Moon?
Remotes are not the issue. Im talking about manned landings. Yes, remotes have been to the moon and mars and some other places. |
Atticus Fynch
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.17 20:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
I find it curious that no blueprints of the LEM or Lunar Rover exist. They were "lost." No original video footage of the landings exists either. They were lost along with the blueprints I guess. The Van Allan radiation exposure issue has never been explained nor the pristine conditions of the lunar photos considering the film had no temperature nor radiation protection in the camera.
There is a whole list of inconsistencies assoctiated with the Apollo program along with curious opportunistic deaths of certain people. This isnt just about anomalies in the photgraphs. |
Atticus Fynch
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 01:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
VKhaun Vex wrote: And lets say it was faked. Do you want Eisenhower Impeached? Want to make him go shake hands with Khrushchev and be a good sport about it? Oh right, they're both dead... Do you want to argue with NASA/The World that they can't really do that? Oh right, technology has been moving forward for 40 years... It's a dead end discussion with no consequence for those alive today no matter how you spin it.
Imagine the repercussions if the landings turned out to be faked. Even if those involved are long dead, it gives the US a longer nose than pinocchio and would probably start a new space race for another country to be first. |
Atticus Fynch
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 02:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
The links address those pics...and it is a NASA site you are linking to. |
Atticus Fynch
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 07:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Because the soviets would have just gone along with a fake moon landing by their enemy
Keep in mind it is curent techology that is slowly exposing this via the internet. Why would the Soviets have be any the wiser?
According to the world the US went to the moon...right?
Why would anyone doubt such a thing?
Put many bits and pieces when put together show something strange about the whole Apollo program. |
Atticus Fynch
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 07:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
VKhaun Vex wrote: This thread stinks of SO MUCH STUPID I can hardly stand it.
The only "stupid" I see in this thread are people saying "you're stupid for not believing it" but I have yet to hear any arguments on specifics.
-How were the astronauts shielded from radiation? -Why are there inconsistenies in the photographs? -Why oh why for such a huge event in all of humanity could things like blueprints and orignal footage disappear? Hell the US still has the original Declaration of Independance and Constitution from the 1700s, but it cant keep the stuff for man's first steps on the moon from the 60s and 70s?
This one video is also strange: (supposedly viewed from 110 000 miles on the way to the Moon.)
http://www.archive.org/details/Apollo11EarthViewFaking
Lastly, no one here has looked at the links in depth. The first one is over 10 pages of text and photos (not exactly for thr TLDR crowd). No one has addressed any of the specific questions presented.
So that is the only kind of "stupid" going on here. Wether I beleive or not is not the point. The question is, why inconsitencies in the whole Apollo program and could such a huge lie (if it is a lie) actually be pulled off and kept for so long? |
Atticus Fynch
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 09:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sidus Isaacs wrote:I never understood why people want to belive it was fake. It is kind of like a religion I guess.
It's not that people want ot believe it's fake. It's just that a lot of little things abut the whole Apollo program dont add up. |
Atticus Fynch
85
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 14:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
Quote:NASA's Damning Admission, Wires, Fake Globe, etc. Check out this stunning admission by NASA: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN3139657820080331(Reuters) - Cosmic rays are so dangerous and so poorly understood that people are unlikely to get to Mars or even back to the moon until better ways are found to protect astronauts, experts said on Monday.
http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1496 - |
Atticus Fynch
123
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 15:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:There is only one thing you have to tell people to prove we landed on the moon. You don't have to disprove anything or answer anything else. The fact of the matter is that any government on earth with radio technology could pick up the transmissions from the moon and triangulate where they were originating from.
So unless every single developed nation, INCLUDING the evil Russians, decided they wanted to help NASA pull off this hoax, it happened.
A transmission from high earth orbit is indistinguishable from a transmission from the moon. The argument here is not -have we been inspace-. that is a given. The question is, have we been to the moon. - |
|
Atticus Fynch
123
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 16:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:Nooo it's not. It might be for one nation that happens to have a high orbiting craft directly in line with the moon but it would be physically impossible to pull this off with every nation at the same time. People on the moon broadcasted live. Everyone picked it up. So I will admit, either this is a worldwide conspiracy, or it did have to happen.
The only people that "picked it up" was NASA. The footage shown in TV was from NASA TV screens, so everything you saw in regard to the moon landing transmissions was filtered through NASA first. NASA controlled what the world saw. - |
Atticus Fynch
208
|
Posted - 2011.12.31 18:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
Well, it looks like the thread has reached its end.
I want to thank you all for the laughs.
You may now remove the hooks from your mouths.
Love ya, Atticus - |
Atticus Fynch
208
|
Posted - 2011.12.31 19:14:00 -
[13] - Quote
I love you Alara. You're the gift that keeps on giving.
xoxoxox
- |
|
|
|